Nokia C3 Best Review : An entry offering from HMD International. If you bother?
HMD Global may not have experienced a standout Nokia smartphone in some time, in my view, but there is no denying that many of its Android telephones to have looked quite great.
Nowadays, we are going to be reviewing the organization’s latest entry-level Android offering, the Nokia C3.
This funding telephone includes a very simple design and fundamental specifications, but that should be sufficient to offer you an adequate Android encounter.
This mobile appears quite cheap, with a beginning price of Rs. 7,499. It is time to find out whether the Nokia C3 Rs. 7,499 is really worth buying.
Nokia C3 layout: A little too easy
In the event the Nokia title was not sufficient nostalgia, the removable battery at the Nokia C3 should certainly bring back a few memories.
The whole back shell is just one piece of plastic that comes off so that you may set up the battery, SIM cards, and a microSD card. There are two slots for Nano-SIM cards, which means you won’t require any adapters.
I possess the Sand color, which I think looks really great. It is not too thick in 8.69mm and weighs a comfy 184.5g.
The Nokia C3 appears elegant, as a result of its minimalistic back which just has a small vertical camera module and a fingerprint sensor.
The rear panel does not bring in fingerprints, and provides good traction. The quantity and power buttons are to the right, whereas the committed Google Assistant button is put on the leftside. There is a headphone jack on the top along with also a Micro-USB port in the base.
There is no cutout for a speaker, and that is since the Nokia C3 utilizes its earpiece because the loudspeaker.
Coming into the front of the telephone, there’s a 5.99-inch HD+ IPS screen with toughened glass. The plan of the front feels nostalgic, but frankly, this is something which’s best forgotten.
Rather than a top notch, the Nokia C3 includes thick, conservative boundaries on the top and underside, and comparatively thinner ones into the sides.
This is not a huge complaint for an entry phone telephone, but considering its peers also have moved to more contemporary designs, I believe HDM Global might have done much better.There is no headset or case.
Nokia C3 functionality: Functional at greatest
It is made of eight ARM Cortex-A55 CPU cores running at around 1.6GHz. It is built on a somewhat old 28nm fabrication procedure, which may not be power-efficient as what a few of the more recent SoCs out of MediaTek and Qualcomm use.
Other attributes include Wi-Fi , Bluetooth 4.2 and FM radio. The latter needs a headset to be attached to be able to do the job. It’s some basic detectors like a proximity detector, ambient light sensor and an accelerometer.
There is no gyroscope and compass regrettably, so you can not find the way you are facing in programs such as Google Maps.
The Nokia C3 runs inventory Android 10 using only the basic programs from Google preinstalled. The sole third-party program is called My Telephone from HMD International, and it is for after-sales support and apparatus maintenance.
You get some fundamental gestures from the Preferences program, but that is the area of the customisation. The Google Assistant button ought to be handy if you’re a avid user of Google’s helper. It can not be remapped to establish any other program or operate though.
The C3 isn’t a part of Google’s Android One app, which means you don’t get that assurance of 2 decades of software upgrades. But at least it is not operating Android 10 (Move Edition) such as the Nokia 1 Rs. 5,688 .
Utilizing Android about the Nokia C3 was a good experience, but with 3GB of RAM and bone-stock Android, it was not the smoothest.
Animations and multitasking caused a few irregular stutter and lag. The fingerprint sensor functioned nicely, however, the display took somewhat longer than normal to awaken. Face recognition was slow to kick and execute authentication.
Gaming performance was not good either. Straightforward titles like Sky Force Reloaded worked fine, but anything thicker actually struggled to operate well or deliver fantastic images.
This absence of functionality is observable in benchmarks too. On the other hand, the images scores were a bit reduced. The screen becomes satisfactorily bright and videos do not seem too bad for it. The earpiece speaker becomes especially loud as it strikes you straight and there is little to no possibility of being blocked by your own palm.
It performed quite badly in our HD video score evaluation, lasting for only 7 hours and 34 minutes, and this is among the smallest times we have listed in some time.
With moderate to light usage, I managed to get only about a complete day of battery life, but viewing videos or gambling drains the battery fast. Charging the battery is not quite rapid.
You simply receive a 5W power adapter in the box, and when attached to a charger that is quicker, I was just able to charge up the battery to about 43 per cent in one hour.
The Nokia C3 includes one 8-megapixel rear camera along with also a 5-megapixel selfie camera.
The program provides fundamental shooting modes but a few common ones like Portrait style, are overlooking. There’s an auto-HDR feature, which can be wonderful to see.
Unfortunately picture quality is very underwhelming, even in daytime. I discovered the dynamic selection to be somewhat weak, with the majority of landscape shots demonstrating bad specifics and knots.
Close-ups were somewhat better, but textures usually looked horizontal and smoothened-out. Low-light pictures turned out with bad detail.
Selfies normally had feeble detail also, and vulnerability was all over the area when shooting through the day. In low light, many selfies were almost unusable.
The Nokia C3 can take around 1080p movie, however I found the quality to be below average, even throughout the day. Autofocus was also very lethargic.
Total, the cameras around the Nokia C3 are extremely unsatisfactory, and just not great enoughfor casual photography.
That I think that it’s pretty apparent by now that the Nokia C3 does not offer you the very best value for money, particularly the 3GB version that is priced at Rs. 8,999.
I believe that the Realme Narzo 10A$ 9,999 (Inspection ) or even the Narzo 20A Rs. 8,499, which we are currently analyzing, would be a lot better choices.
Aside from decent build quality and a fresh Android encounter, the Nokia C3 does not have enough going in its own favor to warrant this cost. The operation is middling, battery life is feeble, cameras are not great, and it seems somewhat conservative.
6,999 ought to be a much better choice in Rs. 7,499. You eliminate the fingerprint detector and functionality is more or less akin to that of the C3, but you’ll be getting better battery life.
- Reasonable build quality
- Old-fashioned layout
- Weak General functionality